Me and My Imaginary Friends

The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool.

Monday, January 07, 2008

Seen and Read

Seen:

The History Channel played a two-hour program on the KKK the other night.  I knew it might be difficult to watch, but I wanted to at least try.  The program began at 8:00.  I stopped watching it at 8:04.  Those 4 minutes were made up of about 2 minutes of opening "historical" dialog before launching into the meat of the program.  So, in reality, I couldn't make it through 2 minutes.  Those first 2 minutes showed modern day KKK "rallies" where the ugliest, nastiest white men you've ever seen march through small towns and then start yelling to an all-white crowd about Jews, [insert N-word here]s and [insert S-word here]s .  The worst part is that the historical intro had described the KKK as an organization with roots in Christianity.

I felt physically sick.  This world is so twisted and demented.  What probably upset me the most (beyond the hateful words) was the large percentage of teenage boys that go along with this hate.  They are literally breeding hate into their children.  I can't fathom it.


Read:

I'm beginning a long series of books about various historical royal personages.  All of the books were written by Jean Plaidy, an author who I dislike under a different pseudonym.  She writes fairly accurate historical stories as if they were novels.  So, the dialog you're reading didn't actually take place.  But it is based on the best concept we have of what was going on and how various people felt about it at the time.  Plaidy makes history come alive by presenting characters that you identify with and care about.

I actually read the first one a few months ago.  It was a re-release of three of her books into one megabook.  It told the stories of Charles II, King of England and his little sister who married the younger (mean and gay) brother of the King of France.  Briefly, Charles II is known as the Merry Monarch.  He was of the Stuart line of kings (who were Catholic and had ties to Scotland).  His father, Charles I, was overthrown by Oliver Cromwell during the Puritan revolt.  For a 22 year period, England had no monarch - until the fall of the Puritans and the return of Charles II.

The book I just completed was about Henry VIII's first wife, "Katherine of Aragon" (in quotes because that's the title of the book).  Before reading this book (also a re-release of three books into one), I knew very little about Henry VIII.  Generically, I knew that he'd had a bunch of wives, some or all of whom he'd killed off and that he was the father of one of England's greatest monarchs, Elizabeth I (you know her as Cate Blanchett). 

Here is Katherine's 640 page story in a nutshell:
She was the daughter of Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain (the pair who bankrolled Chris Columbus to come and find us).  At 16, Katherine came to England to marry Arthur, the Prince of Wales (that title is always given to the next in line to be ruler of England).  Arthur was 15 and not quite a healthy boy.  So Arthur's father, Henry VII, allowed the marriage to happen, but would not let them consummate it (too taxing and all that).  Arthur died just six months after the wedding and Katherine became a virgin widow.  Unfortunately for her, her father had not yet paid her dowry and Henry VII wasn't going to let her go home without his money.  She was kept in England for another 7 years, almost destitute.  After Henry VII's death, Henry VIII was advised not to marry Katherine, which solidified his desire to do so.  Henry was 18 when he became king and 20 when he married Kate, who was 25.

Henry VIII (from here on out referred to simply as Henry) saw himself as a romantic rescuer.  He wasn't really in love with "Kate," but he loved that he rescued her from despair while also proving that the king could marry whomever he pleased.  It was several years and stillbirths/miscarriages later before he became unfaithful to Kate.  Katherine followed her illustrious mother's example by turning a blind eye to Henry's indiscretions.  She was deeply religious, to the point where the people thought of her as saintly.  Over the years, Henry made and broke and had broken against him several treaties with the kings of Spain (Kate's own father), the Holy Roman Empire (Kate's lunatic sister's son) and France (no discernable relation to either Henry or Kate).

After 20 years, 6 failed pregnancies and one living *female* child (oh, the horror!), Henry found a young girl who refused to become his mistress.  Anne Boleyn demanded to be his wife.  Henry found a scripture in Leviticus that said, "You should not lay bare the nakedness of your brother's wife."  Based on this one scripture, he claimed that his conscience told him that he did not have the right to marry Kate in the first place.  He further claimed that her failed pregnancies were proof of God's displeasure in their marriage.  He applied to the Pope for an annulment (seriously, after 20 years, an annulment).  Politically, the Pope was caught between a rock and a hard place.  The Emperor Charles was naturally on his aunt's side, who did not want an annulment.  Annulment meant that her one child, Princess Mary, would be declared a bastard and would not be in line to inherit the throne.  Unfortunately for Henry, Charles held more sway with the Pope.  After years of delaying a verdict in the case, the Pope finally ruled on the side of Katherine. 

But by that time, Henry no longer acknowledged the Pope as the supreme religious authority.  Anne Boleyn had introduced Henry to the works of Martin Luther.  Someone else put the idea in his head that *he* should be the head of the church in England, not some Pope in Rome.  Henry declared that England would no longer be part of the Catholic Church.  An English court gave him an annulment and he married Anne a while before the Pope's decision came down.

So...that's a long nutshell.  But here's what I'm thinking.  Here's this man who is incredibly selfish and motivated purely by his own desires.  In the eyes of God he had absolutely NO RIGHT to divorce his wife.  In fact, the Israelite law of brother-in-law marriage proved that Henry was twisting one scripture to his own advantage while ignoring other principles.  Also according to God's law, Katherine had a right to divorce him for his adultery, certainly not the other way around. 

However, as I contemplate the course of true worship through the ages, it seems to me that the resulting break from the Catholic Church was critical.  It allowed people to question what they were being taught.  It eventually allowed for the writing of the King James Version of the Bible.  It allowed Puritanism to develop and grow in England.  It eventually lead to the spread of all branches of Protestantism.  It lead to freedom of religion in this and many countries.

It's difficult to wrap your mind around the idea that a selfish and immoral man played such a large part in advancing true worship.

I've moved on to Anne Boleyn's book.  Her story is written like a first person memoir.  She is recalling the events of her life while she is a prisoner in the Tower of London (been there!).  I do know how her story ends, but I don't know all the details yet.  I am hoping to read a story about all six wives of Henry VIII.  Then I will read about the women around this story - Henry's two sisters and his two daughters.  I may back up and read about his father.  Henry VII became King at the end of a long war and was always worried that some challenger would rise up to try to take his throne.  That sounds pretty interesting.

[and now a word from our sponsors...]



Make distant family not so distant with Windows Vista® + Windows Live™. Start now!

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have read a couple of Plaidy's books. But not in years. I agree with you about her other "nom de plume" - those I also disliked.

You've peaked my interest in trying Plaidy again. Gonna have some time on my hands sitting at home in a few weeks, after all!

6:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I picked up a couple of these books at B&N today... couldn't remember which ones you'd said you had recently read (information overload these days) and interestingly came home with Katharine and Anne...

4:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home